I was discussing physics and technology with my father one day. He is a degreed Electrical Engineer and I was a little amazed that he still thought anti-gravity would be a good idea or an efficient one after explaining how the universe works. I had to explain that matter is condensed energy and is at a higher energy density versus the surrounding free electrons/positrons. What would be easier to get a grip on with your hand air or water? Why is water easier to grip? Is it because the density is closer to that of your hand?
Therefore, what is easier to grip then air or the free electrons and positrons? The air would be. While anti-gravity is possible, it is not very practical, due to the very low efficiency. One would need to accomplish the same thing a wing does, you need to chang the density of energy above or and below the craft. The easiest and most efficient method of lifting is by buoyancy.
How about power sources, do they follow the same density rule? Why yes, yes they do, therefore what will be more efficient at producing energy? Something based on matter, like gasoline, hydrogen, ethanol, etc., and not some mystic energy source that everyone keeps thinking we will pull out of our butts. We have blown through massive amounts of natural resources all for nothing. We do not have much to replace it with besides hydrogen and we will need that to drink. The majority of gasoline is wasted, goes to keeping our population happy, and is to keep the same people in power. Over 90% of what we produce is useless garbage that is not really needed, WE WASTE SO MUCH.
What about sunlight? Well it is fixed. Only so much hits a square meter a day, and we still have the same efficiency problems regardless of if we use panels or heat engines. We could also use the space and sunlight to grow food with, so that is not a magic solution either. Study the Carnot cycle to understand that we need two potentials to perform work. That friction cannot be avoided so no engine will ever be 100% efficient. The only way to have a 100% efficient device is to have another phase for matter, an inverse. Energy is the inverse to matter, E=MC squared.
For energy to kick in and do work during its phase matter must run out of potential. It also has to run out in a certain manner or else the cycle/harmonics would slowly die out. Our universe is expanding and doing so at a faster and faster rate. This is due to increased surface area to volume ratio. Pieces of matter are breaking apart and becoming smaller and smaller, this allows the matter to burn faster, and effect/expand space faster and faster. This is important or else the cycle would die out. Energy needs the kick at the end to ensure that when it collapses it has enough force to create the same amount of new matter needed to continue the cycle. Entropy is a beast and hard to beat.
I might be able to build a better heat engine, but humanity does not deserve it right now. We would just waste it too like we have the majority of the technology we have, not to mention we are already at each other's throats. How many so called internet experts cannot even build the devices they use to spew hate...yet they act like they know everything (I know I have to be careful in this area too, or risk becoming a hypocrite).
I just cannot stand the belief that you can get something from nothing and that things magically appear and disappear in front of my eyes. I cannot believe in any physics theory that is based on this either. I have proven that Einstein did not understand magnetism and that the reason for why rotational magnetic torque does not transfer is scale. When an electron is orbiting the nucleolus of an atom at a conservative rate of 100 Tera Hertz or 100000000000000 cycles per second, tying to rotate a magnet by hand at 1 cycle per second and expecting anything to happen is crazy. It is a mouse fart in a hurricane.
The reason the electro magnet "bumped" or moved a little at first is simple too. The free electrons in the wire are moving even when there is no current, the sum total of this movement is zero and random, or else there would be current. When the electromagnet is turned on, the free electrons accelerate from zero to some velocity going up or down the wire. It is the change in velocity of the electrons that causes the permanent magnet to move in response to the electro magnet turning on. In most wire and voltages, electrons move very very slowly, like 1 meter per hour slow. It is good that wires are packed with free electrons and that waves can propagate down wires faster then electrons can travel. Much like how a sound/pressure wave can travel down a water pipe faster then water can flow through the same pipe.
Add it to the list of things Einstein was wrong about, I like Einstein. I just have more tools then he did however. I do not know if I could have done what he did back then without having a computer and the internet. I just do not like all of his fanboys, their belief in magic, and that you can get something for nothing. They would rather chase their tails searching after mass, when it is surface area to volume ratio, and how many free electrons/positrons that matter displaces.
I did not invert the shape of the flow/jets for dark matter and blackholes in my theory. Instead, I mistakenly just reversed the flow. The shape has to be inverted. The outflow jet for EM waves is really the accretion disc and the inflow jets are above and below the disc. Matter would want to go in the outflow and out of the inflow once processed. I must have been thinking of Hawking Radiation and the large jets at the time. Add it to the list of things I am wrong about.